FREE SPEECH - RushOnline.com

Re: David Horowitz

I have read numerous bits and pieces how David Horowitz challenged college newspapers to run an ad condemning the idea of government reparations for Black Americans.

He allegedly had a ten point argument that seemed eminently sensible.

Some of his points were:

It makes no moral or legal sense to exact payment from people who have committed no crime to people who have suffered no direct harm.

He notes that no group shares singular responsibility for slavery, exclusively benefit from its fruits or consistently suffer harm from its legacy.

He pokes holes in other reparations claims, and concludes by arguing that the movement stigmatizes blacks, ignores history, distorts legal precedent and makes a mockery of our standard notions of justice.

Mr. Horowitz has offered a serious argument in order to counter a wholly unserious political crusade.

Apparently only five colleges have dared to run the ad, and two of those subsequently printed the Horowitz screed.

Rather than embrace the concept of free journalism and the First Ammendment the University of California Berkeley bowed down, touched their forelock, and published a mewling editorial designed to kiss the bums of those students want to suppress free and open discussion.

The University of Wisconsin and Brown University stood pat and defended the First Amendment. [The Brown University parasitic group stole most of the copies of the edition running the ads]

I would suggest that three things are in order:
Someone who has the full text of Mr. Horowitz' ad should publish it on the internet through an appropriate message board. Some web site, such as "Vote.com" should conduct a poll to determine how many people think that the First Amendment should have some degree of priority over "Pseudo Political Correctness". Those of you who think that the University of Wisconsin and Brown University deserve a pat on the back for supporting the First Amendment should email them and tell them so.

I unfortunately do not know the email address of either the University of Wisconsin or Brown University. Perhaps a friendly reader could supply them to others who read this to facilitate such kudos.

A similar email to University of California Berkeley which could serve to explain to them
the meaning to The First Amendment.

* * *

Subject: I'm A Bad American, or am I?

This pretty much sums it up for me:

I like big cars, big boats, big houses, and naturally, pretty women.

I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid level governmental functionary with a bad comb-over who wants to give it away to crack addicts squirting out babies.

I don't care about appearing compassionate.

I think playing with toy guns doesn't make you a killer - I believe ignoring your kids and giving them Prozac might.

I think I'm doing better than the homeless.

I don't think being a minority makes you noble or victimized.

I have the right not to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird or piss me off. This is my life to live, and not necessarily up to others expectations.

I know what SEX is and there are not varying degrees of it.

I know what the definition of lying is, and it isn't based on the word "is"- ever.

I don't celebrate Kwanzaa. But if you want to that's fine; just don't feel like everyone else should have to.

I believe that if you are selling me a Dairy queen shake, a pack of cigarettes,or hotel room you do it in English.As of matter of fact, if you are an American citizen you should speak English.

My uncles and forefathers shouldn't have had to die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born into come disrespect ours, and make us bend to your will. Get over it.

I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you qualify for any special loan programs, gov't sponsored bank loans, etc., so you can open a hotel, 7-Eleven, trinket shop, or any damn thing else, while the indigenous peoples can't get past a high school education if they can't afford it.

I think the cops have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you're running from them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word freeze or stop in English, see the previous line.

I don't use the excuse "it's for the children" as a shield for unpopular opinions or actions.

I know how to count votes and I feel much safer letting a machine with no political affiliation recount when needed.

I didn't take the initiative in inventing the Internet.

I thought the Taco Bell dog was funny.

I want them to bring back safe and sane fireworks.

I believe no one ever died because of something Ozzy Osbourne, Ice-T or Marilyn Manson sang, but that doesn't mean I want to listen to that crap from someone else's car when I'm stopped at a red light. But I respect your right to.

I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster or Jack In The Box.

I don't want to eat or drink anything with the words light, lite or fat-free on the package.

Our soldiers did not go to some foreign country and risk their lives in vain and defend our Constitution so that decades later you can tell me it's a living document ever changing and is open to interpretation. The guys who wrote it were light years ahead of anyone today, and they meantwhat they said - now leave the document the hell alone, or there's going to be trouble.

I don't hate the rich. I help the poor. I know wrestling is fake.

I've never owned or was a slave, and a large percentage or our forefathers weren't wealthy enough to own one either. Please stop blaming me because some prior white people were idiots - and remember, tons of white, Indian, Chinese, and other races have been enslaved too-it was wrong for every one of them.

I believe a self-righteous liberal with a cause >is more dangerous than a Hell'sAngel with an attitude.

I want to know which church is it exactly where the "Reverend" Jessie Jackson preaches; and, what exactly is his job function.

I own a gun, you can own a gun, and any red blooded American should be allowed to own a gun, but if you use it in a crime then you will serve the time.

I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it pisses you off, invent the next operating system that's better and put your name on the building. Ask your buddy that invented the Internet to help you.

I don't believe in hate crime legislation. Even suggesting it pisses me off. You're telling me that someone who is a minority, gay, disabled, another nationality, or otherwise different from the mainstream of this country has more value as a human being that I do as a white male. Hell, if someone kills anyone, I'd say that it's a hate crime.

We don't need more laws! Let's enforce the ones we already have.

I think turkey bacon, turkey beef, turkey fake anything sucks.

I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child - it takes a parent with the balls to stand up to the kid and spank his butt and say "NO!" when it's necessary to do so.

I'll admit that the only movie that ever made me cry was Ole Yeller.

I didn't realize Dr. Seuss was a genius until I had a kid.

I will not be frowned upon or be looked down upon or be made to keep silent because I have these beliefs and opinions. I thought this country allowed me that right. I will not conform or compromise just to keep from hurting somebody's feelings.

I'm neither angry nor disenfranchised, no matter how desperately the mainstream media would like the world to believe otherwise.

Yes, I guess by some peoples' definition, I may be a bad American. But that's tough!

* * *

May 10, 2001

Where have our freedoms gone? We now live under the biggest challenge to our very way of life, our expressions of free speech. This great freedom was granted to us by our forefather's lives. Our government and public media i.e. TV and Radio is kowtowing to the minority, those that find certain words, actions or language offensive. Since when, have the few had the power to change what the masses want or have? We have had books, songs, plays, and now "free speech" outlawed by the few that believe certain words need to be illegal. What constitutes a word, phrase, book, play or speech, offensive and by whom? Does a person in New York, Chicago, San Fransciso or any city in the nation, suddenly decide this? If so, what are the criteria to determine its offensiveness? One person actually verbalizing something. Is that offensive and through that complaint, the rest of mankind is forbidden to use that word, phrase etc. ever again, under penalty of fine and/or imprisonment. Is this what the constitution, as written, by the founding fathers of our country meant by "Free Speech?"

The interpretation of the "Bill of Rights" guarantees all citizens the right to free speech, to speak what we like and don't like even though someone differs with our point of view. This was suppose to give us a voice with our government officials which, were denied in the United Kingdom and another reason we came to America, land of the free. We have the best country in the world, with more freedoms than any other, but are we trading these freedoms in the name of the few? Are we such a society we wear our feeling on our shirtsleeves? Isn't it a paradox to say we have free speech, then outlaw the media we use?

It is this authors belief we are willing to hand this progressive, robust country over to our children with handcuffs that stifle creative thinking. How many great literary articles would not have been written if these laws were in effect when they were written? Would we have had Albert Einstein to give the world the laws of Physics if we restricted him as Germany did? He left Germany because of oppression. I firmly believe in the original law that defines free speech, "not to cause danger to others." Do words create danger? Many will debate this over and over. Will the minority win again and further erode our freedom of speech and other freedoms we are guaranteed by the Constitution? I certainly hope not.

The real problem, which often goes unnoticed, are the individuals and the morality they have been brought up to respect or more commonly not to respect. As a society, we need to go back to the basics of teaching right from wrong. If we do this, then the moral majority will instill in their young, it is wrong to verbally hurt your fellow man. When society deems this not acceptable behavior it will stop, without laws. It's up to you, as it should be. You are the country and your voice is the supreme law of the land. Exercise it! Apathy is certainly the reason we are in this situation in. Government will not interfere, if the people stand up to be counted and assert themselves. Government acts strictly when we fail to address our own problems. As they get use to acting on our behalf, they become more and more intervening as we set back and allow it to happen. Every great civilization has had the same problem. Eventually that civilization has either turned to a dictatorship or lost is identity as a free nation and it ceases to exist. Is this our future? Is this how we pay back our fathers that laid their lives on the line? "Give me liberty or give me death". "I am sorry I have but one life to give". Who of you will utter these words and be willing to pay with your life for these freedoms, to be handed down to our children for a better life?

All we ever see from media, politicians and advertisements is guided toward our children to sell you their belief, to make you feel guilty if you don't go along with perception of their views. Well then, why are the most important freedoms we have not viewed the same way? We seem to be selective about the way we interpret what we want to give our children. Let us select what was given to us by blood, sweat, tears and many lives. Let us give them the freedoms we received and have given away. Let's take back those freedoms and be the guardians of the "Supreme Document" this country was founded on, The Constitution of the United States. We need freedom of expression and speech to delve into literary masterpieces, to go forth into the 21st Century with the furor our fathers came into the 20th Century. We need to accomplish, invent, write and otherwise further our society as a whole.

It is easier for us to set down and write a check to our favorite charity than it is to take steps to shore up our Constitution. Isn't that a sore legacy to leave behind? We were too lazy, busy or didn't care enough to make sure future Americans, our children, have the same right given us by our mothers and fathers. Shame on us as a population. Are you ready to start doing your part as an American in good standing? Vote for values, tell your electives you stand for America's values, good leadership, morality, honesty and the right to live life free. We are losing our vote to promises never delivered, a bone thrown with no meat and we accept this and the politicians know full well we will. It doesn't matter who the president is or who our congressman/congresswoman are, it matters what we believe and what we want. We choose who represents us and that matters. "For the people by the people." Let's make that true again.

In our last election, we the people lost our vote! The United States Supreme Court installed the President, well then do we need an election? Because this was a close election does it matter. Shouldn't we still have the one-person one vote? Shouldn't all votes count? Did we get partisan politics?

We found old voting machine, many illegal procedural problems that have been in the system for years, people altering ballot requests, how did all this happen to the greatest country in the World? Reread above for that answer, it's there. Apathy!

Written by: Paul

RushOnline.com Index * Visitor Debate Index
Cartoons * Hall of Fame * War On Terror * Topic Index* Political Jokes

Ballcaps.com * ChristianMusic.com * Ministers.com * UsedTrucks.com